<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good article on ZAP &#8211; the Zero Aggression Principle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floridalibertarian.com/libertarian-philosophy/good-article-on-zap-the-zero-aggression-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floridalibertarian.com/libertarian-philosophy/good-article-on-zap-the-zero-aggression-principle/</link>
	<description>Freedom in the Sunshine State!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:17:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bruce judelson</title>
		<link>http://floridalibertarian.com/libertarian-philosophy/good-article-on-zap-the-zero-aggression-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce judelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floridalibertarian.com/?p=102#comment-222</guid>
		<description>the zero aggression principle is a bedrock component of defining libertarian philosophy. its application is what makes the difference between evil relations and peaceful ones. it defines the end limits to justify (if it&#039;s existence even is justifiable in any particular case) the rightful use for government , and the ends it needs to be limited to, in order to promote a harmonious, prosperous, free, and (pretty much) just society. if all who called themselves libertarian were highly (appropriately) consistent in its application that alone would probably do wonders for our image and effectiveness. it is a worthy goal to establish recognition of this element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the zero aggression principle is a bedrock component of defining libertarian philosophy. its application is what makes the difference between evil relations and peaceful ones. it defines the end limits to justify (if it&#8217;s existence even is justifiable in any particular case) the rightful use for government , and the ends it needs to be limited to, in order to promote a harmonious, prosperous, free, and (pretty much) just society. if all who called themselves libertarian were highly (appropriately) consistent in its application that alone would probably do wonders for our image and effectiveness. it is a worthy goal to establish recognition of this element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
